Opposition Leader Chaponda Slams MCP Government as “An Accident”

MCP Administration Accused of Fiscal Mismanagement
Leader of Opposition Dr. George Chaponda has delivered a scathing assessment of Malawi’s current government, describing the Malawi Congress Party (MCP)-led administration as “an accident” and “a disappointment” to Malawians over the past five years.
The Mulanje South West parliamentarian accused President Lazarus Chakwera’s government of fiscal indiscipline and failing to prioritize national development in his parliamentary statement titled ‘Failed Chakwera Administration: Malawians Demand a Return to Proven Leadership’.
Economic Concerns and Legislative Bias
“The living conditions of Malawians have significantly worsened since 2020,” Chaponda declared, citing widespread consensus about deteriorating economic conditions. He criticized the government’s handling of key legislation, including the controversial government-to-government fuel purchase arrangement.
The opposition leader highlighted concerning fiscal practices, particularly the K500 billion Supplementary Appropriation Act that exceeded the original budget. “This lack of transparency undermines fiscal discipline and erodes public trust,” Chaponda stated.
Youth Employment and Broken Promises
Chaponda accused the administration of betraying Malawian youth by recalling retired principal secretaries instead of creating opportunities for younger professionals. “This denies jobs to productive citizens and contradicts their empowerment promises,” he said.
Youth for Action Campaign (YAC) coordinator Nungu Mandala echoed these concerns: “We’re disillusioned. The neglect of youth affects their participation in national development.”
Looking Toward 2025 Elections
As Malawi prepares for the September 2025 elections, Chaponda positioned the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) as the solution, praising former President Peter Mutharika’s economic record. “Under DPP leadership, inflation remained in single digits and maize prices were affordable,” he claimed.
The opposition’s strong critique comes as political parties begin positioning themselves for what promises to be a contentious election campaign focused on economic recovery and governance competence.