Gatekeepers Gone Rogue: Why Big Law’s Legal Sector Code Challenge Deserves Contempt
The Controversial Legal Challenge Against Transformation
Three of South Africa’s largest corporate law firms – Webber Wentzel, Bowmans, and Werksmans – have launched a controversial legal challenge against the transformative Legal Sector Code (LSC). Their application, framed as a constitutional concern, appears to be a strategic attempt to maintain the status quo in an industry historically dominated by white professionals.
Understanding the Legal Sector Code
The LSC, gazetted by Minister Parks Tau in September 2024, establishes measurable targets for black ownership, management control, and procurement in law firms with annual turnover exceeding R10 million. The code represents South Africa’s constitutional commitment to redress historical inequalities in the legal profession.
Key Transformation Targets in the LSC
- 50% black ownership within five years
- Increased black representation in senior management
- Minimum thresholds for briefing black advocates
- Preferential procurement from black-owned firms
The Firms’ Arguments: A Closer Examination
The challenging firms raise 11 grounds of review, including claims that the code:
- Applies disproportionately to large firms
- Lacks proper economic justification
- Violates constitutional equality provisions
- Imposes unworkable implementation timelines
Why These Arguments Don’t Hold Water
Legal experts note the five-year consultation process included all major stakeholders. The turnover threshold mirrors other sector codes, and the targets align with South Africa’s demographic reality where 93% of the population is non-white.
The Stark Reality of Legal Sector Transformation
Current statistics reveal alarming disparities:
- Only 17% of senior attorneys are black
- Less than 10% are black women
- Over 60% of private sector legal spend goes to a handful of established firms
The Employment Equity Context
President Cyril Ramaphosa has strongly defended employment equity laws, noting the private sector’s continued dominance by white males in top management positions. The legal sector’s resistance appears particularly tone-deaf against this backdrop.
The Paradox of Big Law’s Position
These same firms actively market their B-BBEE credentials to secure lucrative government contracts while challenging the very framework that enables their preferential procurement status.
Conclusion: Transformation Cannot Wait
After 30 years of democracy, the legal profession remains one of South Africa’s least transformed sectors. The Constitutional Court has repeatedly affirmed that transformation isn’t optional – it’s a constitutional imperative.
As the case proceeds, the public will be watching whether these legal gatekeepers choose to be part of the solution or remain obstacles to meaningful change.
How should South Africa hold law firms accountable beyond B-BBEE certificates? Share your views via WhatsApp at 060 011 021 1.