“`html
Rejoinder: Why the Recall of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is Justified


Constitutional Right of Recall
The ongoing recall process against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan represents a legitimate constitutional exercise driven by constituent dissatisfaction, not political maneuvering as claimed by her supporters.
The 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (as amended) empowers electorates to recall underperforming representatives. Section 69 mandates INEC to verify and proceed with recall petitions meeting signature requirements. Kogi Central constituents have every right to demand accountability from their senator.
Failed Leadership and Constituency Neglect
Rather than addressing constituent concerns, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan has:
- Prioritized personal interests over constituency development
- Refused to apologize for Senate suspension that paralyzed representation
- Failed to deliver on campaign promises like Ajaokuta Steel revival
- Neglected basic constituency engagement and explanation of her actions
Misplaced Committee Priorities
The senator’s focus on reclaiming the Local Content Committee chairmanship rather than lobbying for Steel Development Committee reveals misplaced priorities. This position would directly impact Ajaokuta Steel Company’s revival – a key campaign promise to Kogi Central.
Recall Process: Democracy in Action
Claims of “deceived signatures” insult constituent intelligence. The recall movement stems from genuine dissatisfaction with:
- Lack of impactful legislation
- Absence of federal projects
- Embarrassing conduct in Senate
- Failure to deliver campaign promises
If Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan truly enjoys popular support, she should welcome INEC’s verification process rather than attempting to discredit it.
Conclusion: Let Democracy Prevail
The recall represents a constitutional right, not political persecution. Kogi Central deserves:
- Quality representation
- Federal project attraction
- Accountable leadership
- Constituency-focused legislation
INEC must conduct transparent verification. If requirements are met, a referendum should proceed. Democracy demands that constituents determine their representation.
By Engr Ira Habib

“`